Zero Trust

What is Zero Trust?

Zero Trust is a security design philosophy based on the idea of "never trust, always verify." It discards the assumption that "being inside the corporate network is safe," and instead checks the user, the device, and the context every time access is requested. Now that cloud and remote work have become the norm, it is rapidly becoming the standard way of thinking.

Basics

The basics of Zero Trust

Traditional security was built mainly around dividing the corporate network into an "inside" and an "outside" with a perimeter, treating the inside as trusted and protecting it accordingly. However, with the spread of cloud services and the growth of remote work, the data and users to be protected have moved outside the corporate network, and the very distinction between "inside" and "outside" is losing its meaning.

This is where Zero Trust was born — an approach that verifies each individual access as the starting point, rather than relying on location. Zero Trust is generally designed along the following principles.

  • Verify every access. Whether inside or outside the network, confirm the legitimacy of each request every time.
  • Least privilege. Grant users and devices only the scope they need for their work.
  • Monitor and log continuously. Keep an ongoing understanding of who accessed what.
  • Decide based on ID and device. Determine access based on the user and device state, not the network location.
Image

A visual overview

The diagram below shows the difference between protecting a perimeter and verifying everything with Zero Trust.

Perimeter defense Employee Perimeter Firewall Internal network Business systems File sharing Accounting system Inside the perimeter, everything is trusted Zero Trust Employee Verify Check ID + device Business systems File sharing Accounting system × × Verify each access, allow only what is needed
Visual Guide

Understanding Zero Trust with Diagrams

For those who find the jargon difficult, here are three diagrams that explain the "verify every time, least privilege" idea behind Zero Trust.

Diagram

An analogy: an ID badge still gets checked at every room

Employee Zero Trust check ID + permission Room A Allow Room B Allow Room C Allow Re-checked at each access
← scroll horizontally →

Rather than "once you're in, you can roam freely," your identity and permission are checked every time, at each room (system).

Diagram

Before / after: front door only, or every time

Traditional (perimeter) Zero Trust Employee Front door Checked once Once inside, all trusted Past the front door, rooms are accessed freely without checks. Employee Verify each time Least privilege Needed room Needed room Verify at every access, allow only the scope needed.
← scroll horizontally →

Traditionally, a check at the front door (perimeter) let you roam freely inside. Zero Trust verifies at every access and grants only the needed scope with least privilege.

Diagram

Step by step: how a verified access flows

1 Access request From anywhere 2 Verify ID / device / context 3 Least privilege Only what is needed 4 Log & monitor Always tracked Allow
← scroll horizontally →

Every access verifies the user, device, and context, then grants only the needed scope with least privilege — and everything is logged and monitored.

Pros

Benefits

  • Even if one point is breached, damage is less likely to spread (because each access is verified).
  • Provides consistent, location-independent protection whether inside or outside the network.
  • Fits well with today's ways of working, which assume cloud and remote work.
  • You can see who accessed what, improving visibility.
Cons

Drawbacks and considerations

  • !Zero Trust is a concept, not a specific product. It is achieved by combining multiple mechanisms.
  • !Switching all at once is difficult; planning and a phased migration are required.
  • !A solid ID foundation is a prerequisite (users and devices must be managed correctly).
  • !Monitoring, policy reviews, and similar tasks create an ongoing operational burden.
How to Start

The adoption process (a general approach)

Zero Trust is not completed all at once. A realistic approach is to understand your current state and proceed in stages, starting from the foundational ID layer.

STEP 1PROCESS
Assess the current state Organize the data, users, and devices to be protected, along with current access paths and authentication status.
Asset inventoryCurrent-state review
STEP 2PROCESS
Build the ID foundation Centralize user IDs with Entra ID and others, and strengthen identity verification with multi-factor authentication (MFA).
Entra IDMFA
STEP 3PROCESS
Manage and protect devices Bring work devices under management so their state (updates and protection status) can be confirmed.
Device managementProtection
STEP 4PROCESS
Access control Apply conditional access based on the user, device, and context, as well as per-application control (ZTNA).
Conditional accessZTNA
STEP 5PROCESS
Monitor and improve continuously Monitor access logs and improve continuously while reviewing policies.
MonitoringContinuous improvement
Relation

The relationship between Zero Trust and SASE

A term often discussed alongside Zero Trust is "SASE." The two are not competing, separate things — they play different roles.

Zero Trust is a concept (a design philosophy) of "never trust, always verify." SASE, on the other hand, is one of the means of realizing that concept as a combination of network and security mechanisms. In other words, Zero Trust is the direction you are aiming for, and SASE is one of the options for translating it into a concrete mechanism.

Model Case

An adoption example for a mid-sized company

This is a hypothetical model case based on inquiries we frequently receive. The actual approach and results vary depending on the environment.

Case

~600 employees, service industry

Challenge: Once users entered the corporate network via VPN, they could broadly access internal systems and file servers. If an account were ever compromised, the damage could spread across the entire company. There were also concerns about whether accounts and permissions for departing or transferred employees were being properly revoked.

Existing environment: Internal access assumed VPN. Multiple sites and remote work were mixed, and user management was fragmented across departments.

Before HQ Branch Remote work Internal network Once in via VPN, everything is visible Once in via VPN, much of the network is accessible After HQ Branch Remote work Verify Allowed scope Allow Everything else Block Verify ID and device each time, allow only what is needed
  • 1Centralized user IDs with Entra ID and introduced multi-factor authentication (MFA).
  • 2Brought work devices under management so their state can be confirmed.
  • 3Moved from a "see everything once inside" state to access scoped down per application.
  • 4Monitored access logs and continuously reviewed policies.

Result: Even if an account is misused, the scope of damage is limited to a portion and lateral spread across the company can be prevented. When employees leave or transfer, permissions can be centrally cut off by disabling the ID, and the company can now protect itself by the same standard from anywhere — HQ, branches, or home — whether inside or outside the network.

* The above is a hypothetical model case. The actual configuration and results vary depending on your environment.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

  • QWhat is Zero Trust?
    It is a security design philosophy based on the idea of "never trust, always verify." It discards the assumption that "being inside the corporate network is safe," and instead checks the user, the device, and the context every time access is requested.
  • QHow does it differ from traditional perimeter defense?
    Traditional security divided the corporate network into an inside and an outside with a perimeter, treating the inside as trusted. Zero Trust verifies each individual access as the starting point rather than relying on location, so being inside the perimeter is not treated as safe.
  • QWhat are the key principles of Zero Trust?
    Verify every access, grant only the scope needed for the work (least privilege), monitor and log continuously, and decide based on the user and device state rather than the network location.
  • QHow does Zero Trust relate to SASE?
    Zero Trust is a concept (a design philosophy) of "never trust, always verify." SASE is one of the means of realizing that concept as a combination of network and security mechanisms.
  • QWhere should a mid-sized company start?
    Since it is not completed all at once, a realistic approach is to first assess the current state, then proceed in stages starting from building the ID foundation with Entra ID and multi-factor authentication (MFA).

Talk to us about rethinking your security approach

From challenges such as "we are worried about a state where everything is visible once inside the network," "we want protection suited to remote work and cloud use," or "we don't know where to start," we support organizing your security along the Zero Trust philosophy.

Contact us